Dispute #960

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Humanity Court 2021-10-22 15:09 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2021-11-04 19:35
Arbitrable Creator
Proof of Humanity 0xe82f...2966

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 1 0 0

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 1 0 0
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
0x60da07cfb273051aa9827dabffcd298c305cd00d No 2021-11-01 10:24


Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Challenge Justification As per the current policy, the video must folow same requirements of section 2. Section 2 states: "The picture should include the face of the submitter facing the camera and the facial features must be visible." In this video, the lower part of the face is being blocked by the screen the subject is holding, hence the face is not fully included in the video image. For reference, see case 660 on which the profile was rejected because of bad lighting and face being cropped out of the profile picture (https://ipfs.kleros.io/ipfs/QmTeynUkfybPEqnf5wHt5JPN2yw85oUKg1qyRCTpgAwzRu/whatsapp-image-2021-04-28-at-11.48.44.jpeg). Also in case 899 the submission is challenged because of video mirrored but submitted is also warned that chin is not visible.

Evidence #2:

Check this Case on Kleros Resolve