Dispute #916

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Humanity Court 2021-09-11 17:48 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2021-09-23 18:42
Arbitrable Creator
Proof of Humanity 0x9e97...049a

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 1 0 0

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 1 0 0
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
0xa867aabd9f861d63ea451549fa429a48fb527362 No 2021-09-20 09:32


Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Christopher Allen The rules said "The sign can be a screen". I interpreted this as they can be on screen. Specifically, there is nothing in the policy that says you can't use titling on video. In any case, I have spoken in the video the 8 characters of the address, the first 4 and last 4.

Evidence #2:

Challenge Justification 4. Video of the submitter displaying a sign with his Ethereum address - Required. The sign should display in a readable manner the full Ethereum address of the submitter (No ENS; no ellipsis). The sign can be a screen. The submitter must show the sign in the right orientation to be read on the video. Submitter is not showing any fisical Sign in the video. Should not be accepted as it violated the rules. Video has been edited to show ethereum address which is not allowed. Refer to case 593 among others. Need to vote No.

Evidence #3:

Check this Case on Kleros Resolve