Dispute #888

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Curation 2021-07-22 10:58 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2021-07-27 02:42
Arbitrable Creator
Curate

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 2 0 0

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 3 0 0
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
No 2021-07-24 20:35
No 2021-07-24 13:59
No 2021-07-24 13:59

Evidences

Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Unclear market "question" First off the market question is not formally a question as it is supposed to be. Secondly, the "question" looks unclear and could lead to different interpretations. Finally, the assumption of Alex Saunders being a scammer may have no ground and could be wrong. So, I tend to think this market should be rejected anyway.

Evidence #2:

Questions to Challenger/requester Unless I am wrong you are challenging your own submission: Why is that? Point of this curated list is to avoid invalid markets: If you are challenging the (your own) submission, you are supposed to bring evidence regarding why this market should be declared invalid by Kleros. Do you have such evidence to show?

Evidence #3:

Screenshot Tim Ricci Text is a response to this post from Collective Shift, Nuggets News who are moving to remove him completely.

Evidence #4:

Screenshot This from Tim Ricci a Trusted Friend

Evidence #5:

Challenge Justification Alex Saunders has been accused now from multiple sources of having scammed intentionally a large sum of money from paying customers of his own. I was one of them. This is not a matter of unjust imprisonment but a matter of what is the cost. This does not condone death, rape or anything else on the invalidation list.
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve