Dispute #886

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Non-Technical 2021-07-18 18:38 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2021-07-26 06:28
Arbitrable Creator
Tokens

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 2 0 0

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 3 0 0
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
No 2021-07-22 18:17
No 2021-07-21 23:24
No 2021-07-21 23:24

Evidences

Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Resubmittal with Proper Nomenclature We will resubmit with the proper nomenclature. Thank you all for keeping these lists curated! Your help is extremely appreciated.

Evidence #2:

The word token is uses as suffix in the white paper If the word token will be well established, we don't know. What we know is that is not already well established, as the policy requires. And that in the white paper is used also as suffix, as I demonstrate in the attached document.

Evidence #3:

The suffix of "Token" is intentional and will be well established. "Harbour Token" is referenced 7 times in the whitepaper: https://www.harbourfinance.net/docs/harbour-whitepaper.pdf and attached below.

Evidence #4:

Token challenge The policies establish: "uffixes such as, but not limited to: “T2oken”,“Coin” should generally be avoided, unless aname with suffix is already well established." This token is a new one (launched on 17/7), so the name with the suffix token is not already established at all. In consequence the suffix Token is wrong and the submission should be rejected in its present form.
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve