Dispute #827

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Humanity Court 2021-06-11 12:19 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2021-06-26 05:08
Arbitrable Creator
Proof of Humanity

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 2 0 1

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 2 0 1
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
No 2021-06-19 22:42
No 2021-06-22 02:29


Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

The request to register should not be accepted The submitter did not provide proof of life after the challenge to prove that he is alive and that he owns this ethereum address. He has no proof your ownership of this ethereum address and this submission is being manipulated by a third person. Or he is dead actually. --- See attached file

Evidence #2:

The submitter didnĀ“t provide proof of life Submitter did not provide proof of life after the challenge Submission non-compliant with the registration policy. Registration policy: "Submitters not able to give recent proof of life are to be considered deceased". This is why the request to register should not be accepted.

Evidence #3:

"Persecutions of the Incent" Luis deserves better than that! Trying to help people not lose money to these "Jurors" can get you fired. NO WARNING PEOPLE ALOUD oops will this be deleted cause I shouted?

Evidence #4:

Still no video as requested 4 days ago This is a puppet profile of Agent99 as shown by the common modus operandi, the vouch graph (Agent99 -> Flor -> Pedronas) and Agent99's own admissions. Absence of requested 2nd video indicates Agent99 couldn't find this puppet again. Details in case 833 and attachment.

Evidence #5:

Direct interaction request There seems to be a lot of cases like this one. I think to try to find out what is happening, it would be good for the individuals to provide jurors a time they are available on jitsi (https://meet.jit.si/POHDispute) to interact directly.

Evidence #6:

Submitter must provide new video evidence See attachment.

Evidence #7:

Challenge Justification ownership of the ETH address is the implicit rule in element#4 and this guy's submission go against it as well as the these other similar pic/videos taken on the streets https://app.proofofhumanity.id/profile/0x2727c97172b496b60f6e97865b49a0ca34a3f477 https://app.proofofhumanity.id/profile/0xc082fd778b21edd415641138981f0df329f5109f https://app.proofofhumanity.id/profile/0x7b62f8495cf88b4716da3f420cc75de0404aa9a7 https://proof-of-humanity.netlify.app/profile/0x5a4c3277da56c1920d176bc3a22c8e04e64cc1f7

Evidence #8:

Check this Case on Kleros Resolve