Dispute #767

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Humanity Court 2021-05-23 07:55 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2021-06-07 00:57
Arbitrable Creator
Proof of Humanity

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
1 1 0 1

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
1 1 0 1
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
Yes 2021-06-01 15:29
No 2021-06-01 08:31


Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Real person with disease She is my mother. Seccion 2 said "It can include items worn daily". I consider that I dont violate the rules, since she has cancer. Is this app just valid for perfect people without any medical problem or treatment? It doenst hide mi face or human identity. Thanks

Evidence #2:

Check attached file Read my arguments on the attached document.

Evidence #3:

Challenge Justification The submission guidelines section 2 reads: "Face should not be covered under heavy make-up, large piercings or masks hindering the visibility of facial features" and also that "It cannot include special items worn only on special occasions that can, voluntarily or involuntarily, distract humans or algorithms from being able to detect identical faces." Section 4 reads: "Lighting conditions and recording device quality should be sufficient to discern facial features and characters composing the Ethereum address displayed." Submitter has what it looks like a bandage covering part of her nose both in photo and video, this clearly hinders the visibility of facial features which violates section 2. Both picture and video are of poor quality, picture is grained and pixelated and the video lightning conditions are quite dark, such that the submitter has almost half of her face obscured by shadow which clearly violates section 4. Such poor quality entries should not be accepted into the registry.

Evidence #4:

Check this Case on Kleros Resolve