Evidence #3:
Challenge Justification
The video does not comply with required elements of the submission. In the primary document, under section 4, the primary document states that "The sign should display in a readable manner the full Ethereum address of the submitter". It also states that "Lighting conditions and recording device quality should be sufficient to discern facial features and characters composing the Ethereum address displayed."
Both of these points are not complying with the requirement. The address is not readable. Many characters of the address are too small and indistinguishable. The contrast between the ink and the paper is very poor. The nature of PoH's rules is to avoid sybil attacks, duplicates, deceased and such, and therefore it is of maximum priority that the ETH addresses are smoothly readable, which is clearly not the case.
Please remove submission.