Dispute #712

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Humanity Court 2021-05-15 07:58 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2021-05-30 00:54
Arbitrable Creator
Proof of Humanity 0xbd50...728e

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 2 0 1

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 2 0 1
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
0x34bec78b6d155e14060b3a38a8497d560f45d30e No 2021-05-22 15:52
0xd0061deba693babcc3755d5fbe1327e923cb458f Pending
0xffcbdde40a743e39a3b41e1ac18b48efcdc8d8a4 No 2021-05-22 16:29

Evidences

Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Rebuttal to challenger's latest comment See attached pdf.

Evidence #2:

I plea jurors follow Case & Policy law Already binding cases: #687 & #664. As Policy states "The sign should display in a readable manner the full Ethereum address of the submitter (No ENS; no ellipsis)." As recognized by the other party, the address displayed: ETHaddress+(any non hexa ch). Transparency/coherence: I plea jurors vote NO

Evidence #3:

First-round jury has overstepped its duty There are currently 2 "no" votes and 1 pending vote, so the case will have to be appealed. See attached document for arguments in favor of a "yes" vote.

Evidence #4:

Felipe My address is readable and displayed in full, and although I accidentally added an "x" at the end, "x" not being a hexadecimal character (0-9, a-f) it cannot possibly cause any confusion. My submission is therefore in compliance with both the spirit and the letter of the rules.

Evidence #5:

Challenge Justification the address doesn´t match

Evidence #6:

Registration
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve