Dispute #690

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Humanity Court 2021-05-10 03:06 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2021-05-23 23:49
Arbitrable Creator
Proof of Humanity

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 3 0 0

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 3 0 0
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
No 2021-05-20 11:45
No 2021-05-18 23:55
No 2021-05-20 14:38

Evidences

Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Incorrect submission This submission violates the rule #4. Both technical evidence and case law (615-667-673-674) indicate that the required 360p are not achieved. Please see the attached file.

Evidence #2:

Disputes #615 #617 and #622... are not this one. What I mean with the title … first of all is that the examples used by the challenger are not sufficient for denying my submission because of some reasons. About the rule "4" i will present a defense with help of the defenses exposed in Disputes #673 and #674. All my defense is in the file.

Evidence #3:

The video don´t have at least 360p. Please see the attached file with the technical evidence and precedent cases. This violates rule of guideline # 4: "The video quality should be at least 360p". Therefore the request to register should not be accepted.

Evidence #4:

Challenge Justification Incorrect submission. The video don´t have at least 360p. This submission violates the rule #4 of Proof of Humanity registry policy. Rule #4. "Video of the submitter displaying a sign with his Ethereum address – Required. The video quality should be at least 360p" The submitted video is 352p which is lower than the required 360p. As set precedent by case #615, the video resolution with 352p is lower than the required 360p. The 3 jurors vote NOT to accept the registration. Therefore the request to register should not be accepted.

Evidence #5:

Registration
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve