Dispute #637

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Humanity Court 2021-04-30 07:18 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2021-05-12 19:18
Arbitrable Creator
Proof of Humanity

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
3 0 0 0

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
3 0 0 0
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
Yes 2021-05-08 04:41
Yes 2021-05-07 06:33
Yes 2021-05-09 10:01

Evidences

Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

The policy didn’t strictly call for ‘verbatim’ use Please look at the attached argument No specification of ‘prohibition’ and or ‘exclusivity’ of the registry in one language because the vision to have basic income for ALL humans would also mean room for the possibility of accomodating other languages.

Evidence #2:

Sentences must be pronounced in english Please find attaches the argumentation for removing this registry.

Evidence #3:

Humans have different languages Translations of the required sentence aren't explicitly prohibited in the policy. People are able to speak more naturally in their native language. Harder to create deepfakes with diverse language

Evidence #4:

The phrase in the video must be said in english The submitter must say "I certify...". Submitters should speak in their normal voice a... Poor English accents, mispronunciations, and the switch or oversight of words in that sentence are not grounds for rejections.
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve