logo takes most of the place The evidence comparing size with other logos is misleading. This logo is rectangular, so in order to be of the same size of the other ones it should be distorted, which is a nonsense. Furthermore, the logo takes most of the space in its bigger dimension. No reason for removing the item.

MOST is different from MAX The logo is definitely taking most of the space and is not maxing out space. The rules say " takes most of the space available" When the logo is taking >50% of the space, that's what you call MOST. The reason other tokens with same 'spacing' were removed is that the person made sure it's removed. If you had been winning on disputes due to the opposite party not appealing, then you'll have enough evidence to convince the jurors of 'precedence' to lure the decision to your side. There's no point in removing tokens to the registry due a 'better logo' you found elsewhere and there's no point spending a lot on the submission-rejection cycle due to pixel-level issues or MOST space issues. Hope that the person do this due diligence to checking security badges instead. May I request the jurors to no longer support these unfruitful and time wasteful disputes initiated by the challenger only for personal incentives.

Logo does not take most of available space Logo appears much smaller than all the other submissions in the TCR. It's significantly smaller than other logos. In the attachment you can see it. On top of that, if violates the policy.

Token challenge no reason for removing this item