Dispute #495

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Non-Technical 2020-11-27 23:10 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2020-12-11 09:16
Arbitrable Creator
Curate

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 10 0 0

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 3 0 0
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
No 2020-11-29 18:08
No 2020-12-02 18:17
No 2020-11-30 12:26

Round 1

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 7 0 0
Round 1 Vote Casting Date
No 2020-12-07 08:13
No 2020-12-07 21:10
No 2020-12-05 13:13
No 2020-12-06 11:36
No 2020-12-05 00:46
No 2020-12-06 23:01
No 2020-12-07 15:43

Evidences

Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Juror thoughts Hello, unbiased juror here. I will vote "NO" for this case. I've looked at the guidelines, and this is my reasoning: >Has a significant audience on the platform it is posted: This one is not met. >Consist of the creation or active animation of a significant community related to Kleros or a Kleros dapp. Submission for the active animation of a community can be done each month: This one is not met (yet). I advise the submitter to submit here again when this criteria is met! > Expand significantly the Kleros knowledge base (explaining the juror process, the flow and structure of dapps that integrate Kleros, the court process, etc): I was initially a bit unsure about this one, but I believe to significantly expand the Kleros knowledge is to create new content and information which is not already "known" in english. That is (imo) not what this criteria is about. I urge the submitter to submit again when this group has passed 100 members.

Evidence #2:

Condition #4 satisfied number of views are irrelevant when one of the conditions to be accepted is satisfied. Challenged one of the submitters here based on views but was ruled out due to condition #4. his posts were shared publicly and expand Kleros knowledge base

Evidence #3:

Does not comply with the policies If the new group is in transition from older one, you must wait to have >100 members before uploading it to the list. Otherwise, anyone can create new groups, mention that they are in transition from another, bigger one, and claim the prize many times. That would make no sense. Regarding your claim of expanding the knowledge base of Kleros, the posts in the group would be worth to be accepted in the standard list, given the number of views they obtained, but not in the High Impact List, which requires at least 500 views or being shared 50 times"

Evidence #4:

To Jurors Please check evidence in the attached document

Evidence #5:

Reconsider I urge the jurors to consider the 'awareness' the FB group is bringing to Kleros. The rules say that least ONE should be satisfied and as you can see on the posts in the public group, it ➤ Expand significantly the Kleros knowledge base (explaining the juror process, the flow and structure of dapps that integrate Kleros, the court process, etc)." Consider checking the posts. I've already posted an announcement about the switch on the private community, but can't force them to join right away and video tutorials are still in there.

Evidence #6:

It's in transition The orig community is this https://www.facebook.com/groups/kleros.community/ which has 120 members ( none left since it was first submitted to Storytelling https://curate.kleros.io/tcr/0x99A0f0e0d9Ee776D791D2E55c215d05ccF7286fC/0x03be1412d3f5499677e67c9fee2a43ecec11b10ca1080794176a49a655d368ff) and since there was a previous request to make it public but Facebook doesn't allow private groups be changed to public in settings, I just created a new one and have asked current members to transition. New members are coming in too. >>Consist of the creation or active animation of a significant community related to Kleros or a Kleros dapp. Submission for the active animation of a community can be done each month.

Evidence #7:

Challenge Justification At the time of presentation, the group has only 14 members. "Accept: The submitter creates a chat group about Kleros, this group has at least 100 members"
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve