Dispute #487

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Curation 2020-11-19 13:50 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2020-11-26 20:04
Arbitrable Creator
0x2e3b10abf091cdc53cc892a50dabdb432e220398

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 3 0 1

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 4 0 1
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
Pending
No 2020-11-24 01:17
No 2020-11-23 09:04
No 2020-11-23 22:41
No 2020-11-23 22:41

Evidences

Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

How it is namely Ethereum public good. "The individual people, organizations, software, ... that create, operate, maintain, use, analyze, or convene around the Ethereum Protocol or anything built with the Ethereum Protocol." So, it convenes people to use Ethereum protocol instead of Amazon and benefits people and organizations that can earn Ethereum with both blogging or sales. So it benefits people that "operate" around the Ethereum protocol. And lastly it is creating software around Ethereum protocol. Side note: Constitution needs to be more clear. But now it is on my side. If it is wrong, correct it, but don't judge like wikepedians who ignore the rules they themselves wrote but instead delete everything they just consider "outside".

Evidence #2:

It is a public good. > I really don't see how this is an ethereum public good. It is a public good because it is the world ONLY (correct me if I am not right) really user-editable Web directory. It is also a public good as a Twitter alternative that will pay to the authors. Twitter is a public bad, therefore, this is a public good. There was Google Directory, it was a public good, and it went out of business, so its blockchain replacement (that cannot repeat its fate) is a public good. > The linked website seems like a buzzword laden ebook/content publish platform with very little traction. You are right that it has very little traction yet. But I am likely going to invest several thousands dollars of my personal money to gain traction. It is a content publishing platform, yes. Why a content publishing platform would not be a public good? > Granted there is a little blockchain related content, but its not at all clear how or why this would qualify it as an ethereum public good. A new mean to earn Ethereum for e.g. bloggers.

Evidence #3:

Challenge Justification I really don't see how this is an ethereum public good. The linked website seems like a buzzword laden ebook/content publish platform with very little traction. Granted there is a little blockchain related content, but its not at all clear how or why this would qualify it as an ethereum public good.
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve