Dispute #476

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Non-Technical 2020-11-04 20:15 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2020-11-12 09:53
Arbitrable Creator
Curate

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 3 0 0

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 3 0 0
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
No 2020-11-08 14:25
No 2020-11-08 13:27
No 2020-11-08 21:43

Evidences

Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Dear Requester I will use caps too, to better understand my arguments. The High Impact list, as the policies said: "This tier of storytelling submissions is reserved for high quality / high impact content THAT REFLECTS BOTH EFFORT MADE IN CREATING, AS WELL IN DISTRIBUTING the said content." Your effort to create the content was press ctrl +c and ctrl + v, SO THERE IS NO EFFORT CREATING. In addition, the policies are very cleary in the section "AND SHOULD NOT BE: [...] A REPOST OR CONTENT FROM ANOTHER AUTOR". This "thread" is mostly a copy and paste of the blog article, as was showed in the previous evidence, and does not reflect an effort of creation of content, as the policies require. I urge the jurors to reject this item from the list and keep the High Impact list with High Impact stories.

Evidence #2:

... Dear low-skilled challenger, maybe if I use CAPS you will understand better: THIS IS NOT AN ARTICLE AND I NEVER CLAIM IT TO BE AN ARTICLE! THIS IS A BOUNTY THREAD ON A FORUM AND IT MUST NOT BE UNIQUE! The main goal of this submission is to spread information about Curate Storytelling Bounty and my submission already has 849 unique reads. So, I think the goal is achieved, and according to the rules it must be accepted.

Evidence #3:

The article must be rejected Dear Requester: your article is a copy and paste of the blog post of the storytelling reward from the Kleros team with a small contribution of your own words (https://blog.kleros.io/kleros-curate-storytelling-reward-program/) "This tier of storytelling submissions is reserved for high quality / high impact content that reflects both effort made in creating, as well as effect in distributing the said content." I urge the jurors to protect the level of HI storys. Please see the attached document.

Evidence #4:

This is not an article, this is a bounty thread on the forum. And it matches with this condition described in https://ipfs.kleros.io/ipfs/QmRDQcGvUBzWixZKFHKFWV2Atnum1Ax41feS19UVHsnWh8/kleros-storytelling-high-impact.pdf "➤ Has a significant audience on the platform it is posted. Accept: An article has been read by at least 500 times."

Evidence #5:

Challenge Justification The article is of very low quality. It could be accepted in standard Impact.
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve