T2CR is a place for List Integrity, not personal attacks.
The requester has failed to complete their due diligence before this submission.*
1) It is clear that all authoritative project sources use a fully included "square logo":
a) website - square logo - https://passport.finance/assets/favicon/android-chrome-512x512.png
b) Coingecko - square logo - https://assets.coingecko.com/coins/images/12946/small/android-chrome-512x512.png?1604277448
c) Etherscan - square logo - https://etherscan.io/token/images/passport_32.png
The requester has attached a "rectangle logo" to this token submission:
d) T2CL Token submission - rectangle - https://ipfs.kleros.io/ipfs/QmUUnMJVkLb7h1BKF4XU8Ezcojh7AeWoaDyttucUoNUXts/Bcd3cmPKw7vJZosTr7UoVtX3iSzGJeqjkPe8ebHWseCC8zanHEkXsLNDc82sCfdHHdmtgXUXB4M6a6d4wfsLznim7H
* Please refer to the case of XIO (https://tokens.kleros.io/token/0xdb8a54258ce606dff2c951b7c5e2b5805e75a9d2a1fcb709dc0266a9e4a404da) where the jurors ruled in favor of the challenger and the resulted in Token Rejected based on the Challengers claim: "A square logo is used consistently, but around logo was submitted to the TCR. The logo used for the TCR should match the most commonly used logo, which it doesn't, and should therefore be denied from the TCR until the correct logo is uploaded."
2) The requester fails to provide evidence that PASS is not a "case of duplicates" in the T2CR.
This submission should be denied, and I suggest the requestor Resubmit Token with an (rst-a) official quality logo like the one attached to this evidence (rst-b) under the ticker symbol of PASS2, such as was used in the Nomics listing https://nomics.com/assets/pass2-passport-finance
Therefore, I ask the jurors to vote NO.