Clear violation of jurisprudence
1. Stop with this nonsense of falsely accusing me of owning multiple whale jurors. These are baseless accusations and only show bad intent. I only own one wallet with PNK, and it's this one. Don't try to sway jurors by accusing me of random shit, this won't help your case, and it's ugly behavior. Now lets continue with the arguments
2. If it is a de facto standard to always capitalize tickers, then why are there a large amount of submissions with non-capitalized tickers in the T2CR? In fact, there is a strong precedent, according to which official ticker capitalization should be used for the T2CR. I will provide a non-exhaustive list of all those submissions:
* 9 Compound cTokens,
* 15 Aave aTokens (which have temporarily been removed from the T2CR for incorrect names, it was for instance aETH (aETH), while it should be Aave ETH (aETH),
* 3 renTokens (renBTC, renBCH, and renZEC),
* 2 Synthetix sTokens (sETH and sBTC) - (SBTC even got rejected for incorrect ticker usage) - ,
* 9 other tokens (RFuel, wNXM, rDAI, bCrv, 0xBTC, vBTC, plDai, LYXe, and mUSD).
That's at least 38 submissions in total, all using non-capitalized letters in their tickers. Obviously, the standard for the T2CR is to use official ticker capitalization. Etherscan and Uniswap also follow these standards, but CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko do not. The requester can make up all the arguments he wants, but the evidence speaks for itself. Jurisprudence clearly shows that tickers should be treated the same as brand names, so spelling wise we should follow the official way of writing. For this reason, I also decided to remove Compound UNI (CUNI) for incorrect ticker capitalization, challenge my removal request if you think CUNI is correct :)
Attached is screenshot from https://aave.com/aTokens, clearly stating the official ticker spelling.
3. Besides providing a big list of irrelevant sources (yes they are irrelevant, because they hold no authority and the website page views are negligible), the requester also included some incorrect information in it. According to him, AENJ is the ticker on Uniswap, while in reality, they also use aENJ. All the official Aave sources, Etherscan, and Uniswap consistently use aENJ as a ticker, which is also the standard in the T2CR. The Kleros T2CR should not only remain consistent with itself (note all of the 38 submissions with partly non-capitalized tickers), but also with official sources, while also with Etherscan and Uniswap.
4. TL;DR: Not only is aENJ is most commonly used spelling, it is also the official one. Therefore I ask the jury members in this case, but also the Aave REN and Aave YFI case, to vote NO, allowing the T2CR to remain consistent with itself and with relevant and official sources.