Dispute #450

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Non-Technical 2020-10-31 09:10 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2020-11-07 00:47
Arbitrable Creator
Tokens

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
3 0 0 0

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
3 0 0 0
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
Yes 2020-11-02 16:44
Yes 2020-11-03 12:45
Yes 2020-11-02 16:39

Evidences

Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

I believe this token cannot be removed because this token has been added and Jurors ruled in favor of the requester. I believe this token cannot be removed

Evidence #2:

T2CR demands most commonly used name to refer to asset. Policy: "➤ The name should be the most commonly used name to refer to the asset. It does not necessarily need to be the official name given by project creators nor the one in the token contract." The most commonly used name to refer to this ASSET is Maker (see CMC, CoinGecko, Etherscan, etc). MakerDAO is the project name, and there is a clear precedent that the token name should be used, but more importantly, the most commonly used name. MakerDAO is NOT the most commonly used name, and thus this submission should be removed.

Evidence #3:

The name is correct and can be used does not ask the token creator, so the name of the token MKR. MakerDAO project name https://makerdao.com/en/about

Evidence #4:

It's not a mistake A removal for this token was requested because of the incorrect name. The most commonly used name to refer to this asset is Maker, and not MakerDAO.

Evidence #5:

Token challenge I think that's a mistake, it's a big project. https://makerdao.com and it should be in the database.
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve