Try to win the case with arguments, not personal attacks...
Making it personal, doxing me, and attacking me won't help you in your case. The fact remains, that at the time of the challenge, the submitted logo DID NOT match the most commonly used Switch logo. Exactly for that reason, the jurors in the first round correctly rejected this submission. I will, once again, present a list of sources, which all used a logo consisting of a dark circle, instead of a transparent one. 3 of the biggest coin trackers AND ALL of the official Switch sources, consistently used the same dark circled logo. Therefore, it's crystal clear that the logo submitted to the T2CR was NOT the most commonly used logo.
3. Switch's Twitter,
4. Switch's Telegram,
5. Switch's Medium,
6. Switch's website,
7. Switch's Instagram.
In my previous evidence pdf file you can find a list of some smaller coin trackers, which also consistently use another logo than was submitted by the requester. The requester and the 2 times appeal funder are both unable to give proper evidence, supporting their side of this dispute. Instead, their strategy is argumentum ad hominem. They accuse me of being a dictator and being a secret whale juror. Anyone who knows me, knows that I challenge everything from my own wallet, and know that I am not a whale juror. What I hold in my wallet is all I have. And even if I would have more PNK, that's 100% irrelevant to mention. Stop your personal crusade, it's baseless. I am a long time and active community member, which includes submitting and challenging too. I simply follow the rules of the T2CR policy and existing jurisprudence. Btw, I haven't even funded this 2nd appeal myself, so this shows third-party support for rejecting this submission. Dear jury members of the 2nd appeal round, don't be fooled by the requester's side ad hominem tactics. This submission was in clear violation when it was submitted, and should be rejected as a result.