Dispute #404

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Non-Technical 2020-09-29 10:24 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2020-10-08 21:23
Arbitrable Creator
Tokens

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
1 2 0 0

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
1 2 0 0
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
Yes 2020-10-04 15:06
No 2020-10-04 22:19
No 2020-10-04 20:19

Evidences

Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Submitters Image vs Challenger Image Juror opinion - See attached image for comparison of two images.

Evidence #2:

Juror Decision I am voting for no in this case. I try not to encourage pedanticism in the curation court, as you can see form my previous voting history, however in this instance the policy unequivocally states that the logo should be included in full minus any text unless the text is part of the logo. A quick search for the Sora logo does indeed seem to have the cut version in many results, however there are also results where the circle is full. I assume that someone working for the Sora team had a sloppy cut job when putting together their Telegram etc. logos.

Evidence #3:

Response to juror Actually there is a better image available, I included it in the attachments. Submitted logo is not conform the rules, as it is not fully included. One could also say that the logo is of low quality, because it was poorly cut. As I have showed that there is a compliant logo version of Sora, this submission should be rejected, because it is violating the guidelines.

Evidence #4:

I Vote Yes There seems to be no better image available so rejecting this submission makes no sense. Also, apparently good enough. I don't want to reject this because of technicalities.

Evidence #5:

Response to requester "Why reject a submission with lost pixels?" 1. Because the T2CR is striving to be a high quality list. Provided logos should be of high quality, meaning that it can't be poorly cut. 2. Because the policy explicitly states that the logo should be completely included, as such, no parts can be cut away. ➤The logo should be fully included.

Evidence #6:

Obtained from member That's the logo they have here https://static.tildacdn.com/tild3933-3661-4635-a466-303665666663/sora_menu_logo.svg as also appears in their Facebook account. Looks the same with the one in CMC and Coingecko. We only add token's official info in T2CR, we don't create the logo for the project it represents. Why reject a submission with probably less than 5 seemingly lost pixels?

Evidence #7:

Token challenge ➤The logo should be fully included. The top of the logo is poorly cut, the logo is not fully included. This is even visible without zooming in to the logo.
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve