Dispute #403

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Non-Technical 2020-09-29 02:50 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2020-10-08 21:23
Arbitrable Creator
Tokens 0xa07f...470a

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 1 0 1

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 1 0 2
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
0x53446d0123f9d18cb1e96b6c2bdfecc38248cdb8 Pending
0x53446d0123f9d18cb1e96b6c2bdfecc38248cdb8 Pending
0xf865067a5b9672f11af8514440d9111afd05d040 No 2020-10-04 00:18


Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

OBJECTIVELY SPEAKING Jurors remember this policy: ➤ The name should be the most commonly used name to refer to the asset. It does not necessarily need to be the official name given by project creators nor the one in the token contract Please see the attached file

Evidence #2:

Case to case Pretty subjective IMO. They could have named their token liquidity mining as 'The Sandbox liquidity mining' but it was called 'Sand liquidity mining' YFI is to yearn.finance as how SAND is to The Sandbox. Can be known as both. Check the Coingecko listing too.

Evidence #3:

Token challenge the most used name is The Sandbox
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve