Dispute #381

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Non-Technical 2020-09-13 11:40 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2020-09-29 16:16
Arbitrable Creator
Curate

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
2 3 0 2

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
2 1 0 0
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
Yes 2020-09-18 14:41
No 2020-09-18 10:24
Yes 2020-09-18 22:40

Round 1

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 5 0 2
Round 1 Vote Casting Date
Pending
No 2020-09-23 22:41
No 2020-09-22 14:25
No 2020-09-22 14:25
No 2020-09-22 14:25
No 2020-09-26 01:16
Pending

Evidences

Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

.. Unfortunately I do not have enough money to pay the appeal fee I still don't know why the winning party should pay a fee? I won the last round by the judges ’decision, why should I pay now? I think that the loser should pay and bear all the costs, whether he himself or those who think that he is right! In any case, all the views, likes, comments are real, my submission should be accepted, and this is also what is proven by the judges ’decision. But now the money talk only! I'm really disappointed.

Evidence #2:

Rejecting This Submission is Irrational Considering the rules of the registry and the other accepted submissions, rejecting this submission is irrational. I vote yes.

Evidence #3:

I'm the submitter 1- My video available on 1080p, and have more than 1500 views,and explain the process of court dApp in detail, i don't know how you determined that my video 'low quality'! 2- I targeting a new audience for kleros from MENA who speaks Arabic and maybe they do not know anything about the court dApp, so the explanation should be step by step. I introduced something new to them and added knowledge of more than 1500 people about kleros, now they know about kleros, and they know how they can be a jury through my explanation in the video!! 3- I don't know how you use the word "obviously"!? I think you obviously know that in order to be a judge you must pay "money" and you can earn "money" when resolving disputes, and the submitter must pay "money" in order to create a list or add content, and the challenger must pay "money" In order to challenge the case, and upon appeal, both parties must pay "money". I think it is clear that a "portion" of kleros target audience is interested in making money.

Evidence #4:

Rejection Justification I urge every juror to do a thorough analysis of the video for themselves first. 1. To be accepted as a High Impact submission, the content should be of high quality and widely distributed among social channels. To start, this video is relatively low quality and doesn't add anything valuable to the Kleros knowledge base. 2. It should reflect effort or skill in its creation. However, this video is only 3 minutes long and the creator just filmed himself opening the "Court" dApp and ultimately opening the staking modal. I believe everyone involved with this case can recreate this content within minutes - should we receive High Impact rewards too? 3. Lastly, the Submitter admitted that he did a paid promotion to distribute his content to a large viewerbase. This is perfectly fine, however, he claims that he used the keywords "How can you make money". This is obviously not the target audience we want to expose to Kleros. Let's reject this, as it is of low impact to Kleros.

Evidence #5:

the submitter. I have a problem with my main wallet. Unfortunately I do not have enough money to pay the appeal fee I still don't know why the winning party should pay a fee? I won the last round by the judges ’decision, why should I pay now? I think that the loser should pay and bear all the costs, whether he himself or those who think that he is right! In any case, all the views, likes, comments are real, my submission should be accepted, and this is also what is proven by the judges ’decision. But now the money talk only! I'm really disappointed.

Evidence #6:

Promoting Using Advertisement is Not Forbidden Juror opinion: Apparently video was advertised and that's the reason of high interaction during a short time frame. I don't think advertisement is 'fake views'. There is no such rule in the policy that forbids advertisement. So this argument is not enough to reject the submission.

Evidence #7:

Expand significantly the Kleros knowledge base And In view of similar cases: https://curate.kleros.io/tcr/0x99A0f0e0d9Ee776D791D2E55c215d05ccF7286fC/0x50872969e2c711552dbc98c74839951dc3ff8485fe44b63dd114ca86c0c66d96 This case was accepted, although he didn't met the condition for 500 views! and there are only 10 subscribers. But I think the case was accepted because it offers good content, just like in my case My video detailing how to be a judge in Kleros. I think this supports my case.

Evidence #8:

Promotion Usually I use YouTube ads, either by myself or by another, more experienced company, because some ads containing the word "cryptocurrencies" are rejected by YouTube. This does not mean that all views come from promotion, because my channel is more than two years old and has subscribers and followers And promotion is also by selecting search words For example in this video, I chose "How can you make money" and this is a great search word that gets a lot of views,there are many ways to promote via SEO Once again, I want to clarify that if there was any unreal or unreal liking, it would have been removed immediately from the YouTube administration, and this did not happen. Even with my last video (more than 15 days ago), the number of views is still increasing. https://curate.kleros.io/tcr/0x99A0f0e0d9Ee776D791D2E55c215d05ccF7286fC/0x509534d221d04e5f2c7379142b8e419074fc1e9360ee88557a2de085f00393fe.

Evidence #9:

Promotions "this depends on my promotion " What exactly is the promotion you use to boost the video views?

Evidence #10:

The views are real All views are real In the attachments, showing the source of the views you can check it. YouTube has become using very accurate algorithms, if there are any fake views or likes, it is deleted immediately There are other videos that achieved a high views, and this depends on my promotion of the video and also on the content of the video For example: This video is for Binance and has garnered more than 2,200 views. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FovOs5XNDwk + You should consider the contents of the video that explains in detail how to become a judge on Kleros.

Evidence #11:

Challenge Justification Fake interactions, see attached document.
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve