Dispute #352

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Curation 2020-08-18 00:45 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2020-09-02 18:42
Arbitrable Creator

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
1 12 0 4

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 0 0 3
Round 0 Vote Casting Date

Round 1

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
1 6 0 0
Round 1 Vote Casting Date
No 2020-08-27 01:16
Yes 2020-08-26 17:53
No 2020-08-26 11:46
No 2020-08-26 13:00
No 2020-08-27 15:14
No 2020-08-26 22:47
No 2020-08-26 20:33

Round 2

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 13 0 2
Round 2 Vote Casting Date
No 2020-08-30 16:44
No 2020-08-30 16:44
No 2020-08-30 16:44
No 2020-08-29 18:51
No 2020-08-29 15:21
No 2020-08-28 17:42
No 2020-08-28 18:54
No 2020-08-28 18:54
No 2020-08-29 21:34
No 2020-08-29 00:39
No 2020-08-29 10:54
No 2020-08-29 10:54
No 2020-08-30 17:58


Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Rules and this kind of content Hello guys, Iā€™m convinced that this kind of content has to be accepted to the list, let me explain why. Please take your time and think about it: 1. A meme is an idea [...] that spreads by means of imitation from person to person [...] (Merriam-Webster Dictionary). So a GIF can be a meme. The criterion: ā€ž->Are memes related to Kleros or its dapps.ā€œ is met. 2. Fulfilling one criterion of the guidelines is enough to be accepted (one submission cannot fulfill all of them, also see the examples given in the guidelines). 3. One of the examples of content already is a GIF like the submission. 4. None of the rules for rejection can be applied. 5. There is no rule stating that submissions to the standard impact list must have a minimum diffusion. Think about it, a tweet directly claims ownership and origin. By submitting just the GIF, @Zn1949 does not claim anything directly. I think it makes perfect sense to accept a GIF posted on a free for all platform and for a tweet to must have a minimum of diffusion.

Evidence #2:

Jurisprudence to be rejected The gif presented is identical to cases 348/349/350/351 and 353 and already has jurisprudence. In all these cases the gif was rejected. https://curate.kleros.io/tcr/0x7884a7ADf697e18357087FE8F994669042Af4ae9/0x97f248f9e3bcad2df90f4feb676721b5cd5be4659e8d4bfae14a955530ec8f9c

Evidence #3:

Please look this cases Please see cases 348/349/350 and 353. In all these cases, equal to this, the challenger is winning and the submitter didn't get any votes

Evidence #4:

Again and Again :) Perfecto question but ups wait a min :) almost forget it. So if the main point is the platform, how arbitrators ruled in favor of the submitter in this challange (i mentioned before). And let me think for your question please... As i know other social media platforms (mostly used ones for submissions on this contest) also supports GIFs. But why did the team used "Gifs.com" url on the example side of listing policies? You just talking about likes and retweets but if i post this GIF on twitter and ask my 5 friends to like/retweet my tweet, will this way be more useful? -,-

Evidence #5:

Thanks again Again I thank the submitter for reinforcing my point. The important thing is the platform, says. Now I ask, if I upload a tweet without any likes or retweets, should it be accepted? Clearly not, the story upload must meet a minimum of requirements and you wanted to earn money without trying hard enough.

Evidence #6:

Argument Again :) Are sure about to read whole rules -.- this challange (last one i mentioned) submitted with Gifs.com content. Evidences about another platforms reviews and likes doesn't mean anything. He/she participated with Gifs.com content and accepted via this link. So please don't understand what you wanna understand, the main point is the platform :)

Evidence #7:

Excellent comparison Thank you very much dear submitter for showing the jurors what a gif that takes a minimum of work is and explains, albeit superficially, what Kleros is. You have hit the mark yourself. I ask the jurors to please see the gif sent as evidence and compare it with the one in this case. Also note that the gif of this case was not even the slightest diffusion before pretending to be listed.

Evidence #8:

Argument Here is another example about this challange; https://curate.kleros.io/tcr/0x7884a7ADf697e18357087FE8F994669042Af4ae9/0x93a60c56bec9d31d1c1a48cafe040321259402f85b27c8b46da388a04f3b15aa https://resolve.kleros.io/cases/329

Evidence #9:

Argument https://telegra.ph/The-rules-list-this-platform-as-valid-08-19

Evidence #10:

Challenge Justification The storys standars must have a minimum of work and diffusion. I urge the juries to no longer accept this type of gif
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve