Only one condition is enough The difference between the parts "Accept submissions that:" and "In addition all submissions should:" make clear that only one condition is enough for the first part. There are so many different possibilities it's unlikely a single submission will meet them all! Someone asked the question on the support group and a dev replied one of the items (possibilities) should suffice. Message screenshot: https://ibb.co/HXxnWNN Message link: https://t.me/c/1437527498/181 Group invite link: https://t.me/joinchat/GGUsLhwZj_-aa0SoQTBltA

Case 343 Choosing "yes, add it" would be consistent with case 343. The arbitrator ruled in favor of the same submitter. https://curate.kleros.io/tcr/0x7884a7ADf697e18357087FE8F994669042Af4ae9/0xe6233020f053e51ca18d7b623589cec2de7af0d3f145275691f14389de87edc9 All cases against submitter were resolved as YES, and all other memes submitted were accepted.

Examples The first acceptable condition shows an example of a meme liked by 5 but it's just an example. The last possibility is being just a meme and the example doesn't have likes. A meme both with likes or no likes is acceptable.

Just memes are acceptable Being just a meme is the last of the five acceptable conditions. The sharing across social channels or number of views are separate possibilities.

Challenge Justification Part of the rule needs the meme shared across social channels. The meme was neither shared nor is searchable in public channels and so no way to measure the engagement received needed to qualify for the reward