Dispute #338

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Non-Technical 2020-08-16 04:57 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2020-08-22 10:43
Arbitrable Creator
Tokens

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 3 0 0

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 3 0 0
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
No 2020-08-18 19:04
No 2020-08-18 22:32
No 2020-08-18 18:53

Evidences

Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Logo do not fit criteria According to listing rules, logo should be fully included. It's easy to find one on Sentivate official website that is not cut and matches criteria (see attached file). So, submitter should push a new submission with a fitting logo and this submission should be refused.

Evidence #2:

Logo Logo would ideally use full, uncropped logo. However, Etherscan logo matches submission logo (https://etherscan.io/token/0x7865af71cf0b288b4e7f654f4f7851eb46a2b7f8) One logo and favicon served by Sentivate matches submission logo (https://sentivate.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/cropped-SNTVT-Logo-Transparent-Red-270x270.png) Favicon of Sentivate site matches submission logo: Official logo including title cropped in similar fashion (https://sentivate.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/logoWhiteBG-1.png) Full logo (https://sentivate.com/wp-content/uploads/brizy/12/assets/images/iW=684&iH=696&oX=0&oY=0&cW=684&cH=696/logo.png) Twitter logo (https://twitter.com/Sentivate/photo)

Evidence #3:

Token challenge Top and bottom part of the logo is cut
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve