Dispute #334

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Curation 2020-08-14 14:48 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2020-09-01 03:31
Arbitrable Creator

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 16 0 1

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 2 0 1
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
No 2020-08-23 15:36
No 2020-08-18 18:36

Round 1

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
2 5 0 0
Round 1 Vote Casting Date
No 2020-08-24 21:41
No 2020-08-24 17:25
Yes 2020-08-24 21:48
Yes 2020-08-24 21:48
No 2020-08-26 12:48
No 2020-08-25 21:50
No 2020-08-26 14:43

Round 2

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 15 0 0
Round 2 Vote Casting Date
No 2020-08-28 13:19
No 2020-08-28 21:29
No 2020-08-27 14:44
No 2020-08-28 08:18
No 2020-08-28 12:25
No 2020-08-29 18:51
No 2020-08-29 21:21
No 2020-08-27 18:08
No 2020-08-27 00:57
No 2020-08-27 01:42
No 2020-08-26 20:32
No 2020-08-27 21:56
No 2020-08-27 09:39
No 2020-08-27 09:39
No 2020-08-26 20:06


Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Stop crying Stop crying and be careful next time before hit the send button

Evidence #2:

Challenge says Dear jurors with all due respect, I am attaching a pdf file to prove that the subbmiter was simply wrong and don't understand what a curated list is.

Evidence #3:

Appeal Round 2 7 jurors drawn in this round have already been drawn and voted in prior rounds. What a waste of time. Hurry up and get it over with boys. Double check how others have voted on Kleroscan just to be sure! Since this round is a waste of time, I will let you know my thoughts on the Curate process. You guys that keep challenging submitters on pedantic failure to adhere to imagined processes in order to farm ETH - do you understand the purpose behind the Storytelling campaign? Do you also understand you are putting people off even making submissions? Any third parties reading this - I advise you unstake all PNK from the Curate court unless you want to deal with the Sybil attack squad yourself.

Evidence #4:

Appeal Summary Dear jurors, I attach a PDF document containing the basis of the appeal for your consideration.

Evidence #5:

Appeal Can you please point me to the curated list format rules? The only explicit rules relate to the content of the listing itself - i.e. the meme, the article - not the format of the submission. I know in an ideal scenario the format should contain full title, author and links, however even it appears that this has not been followed in other items which have been registered. For example: No title - https://curate.kleros.io/tcr/0x7884a7ADf697e18357087FE8F994669042Af4ae9/0x7f25f9af2305fb5afd7baeaeb008b8f21d9a9164b129b81a6aa9422fd8f5d179 No author - https://curate.kleros.io/tcr/0x7884a7ADf697e18357087FE8F994669042Af4ae9/0xb2eb84e15d498678517744d59ba5bbbe915577263e4f8c86a9dcbd561f61c2a3 If listing rules are to be enforced when deciding whether to register a listing or not, irrespective of whether the content of the listing meets the listing requirements, then the listing format rules should be made explicit. The content of this listing meets all the rules that are explicitly listed.

Evidence #6:

Unacceptable submission Every submitter is bound to respect rules and the curated list format. List quality also relies on filling correctly each and every field: each submitter is liable for this and should be careful. It would be unfair to all submitters, that carefully check their submission, to accept this one and it would also degrade list's quality. Even if it is an unintended mistake, this submission should be refused and submitter should push a correct one.

Evidence #7:

Appeal II If the ruling of the jurors in Round 1 have been made due to failure to provide a title, author or link in the submission itself - there is no policy within the listing guidelines which explicitly state that these are required. Reference is only made to the nature and content of the storytelling submission. In this case the article meets the listing requirements. Obviously it would be best practice to ensure a title, author and link are provided in the initial submission and not an evidence entry, but due to there being no explicit requirement I feel an appeal of the original ruling has merit.

Evidence #8:

Appeal I am not sure what the issue here is? Attached is a screenshot of the Kleros article on Steemit in the Russian language. Translate it to English and it is an original piece which has engagement in the comment section. The link in the challenger's screenshot includes the submitter's username and hence appears as a null article due to malformed URL. Article itself appears to meet the conditions in the listing criteria.

Evidence #9:

third party view Dear submitter, the rules are clear, and you made a mistake in your submission. Stop wasting your money and submit again your item providing a tittle, author and link as should be done the first time. It's sad to lose some money, but it's part of the learning process. I encourage you to submit again the item but wait until the next month, because in the list we have reached the 100 items limit

Evidence #10:

Kleros – обзор проекта и принцип его работы Negligible content? Your description is now only negligible here. What kind of justice are you talking about here? 1. I took the time to write this article. 2. I invested in a transaction to publish my work. I made one mistake. What's the problem? If it's a big problem for you, cancel the application and don't rape me anymore.

Evidence #11:

Absolutely nothing has been published I understand the desire that many have to upload stories to the list, in order to win some PNK, but I believe that the content of this story is null according to the link that the sender offers us. I attach a screenshot to where the uploaded link derives. Dear jury, do you really believe that you can give a prize for uploading absolutely nothing, and suddenly as I said before, without the author's name and without a link? I hope justice is done, this publication should not be admitted.

Evidence #12:

Kleros – обзор проекта и принцип его работы I've added all the details about my work below. There was a shipping error. What's the problem? It's a human factor.

Evidence #13:

Challenge Justification This uploaded story should not be accepted as it has no content, no title, no Author, no link.

Evidence #14:

Kleros – обзор проекта и принцип его работы https://steemit.com/kleros/@elizzium2018/kleros-obzor-proekta-i-princip-ego-raboty elizzium2018
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve