Dispute #333

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Non-Technical 2020-08-13 19:06 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2020-08-19 08:36
Arbitrable Creator
Curate

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 3 0 0

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 3 0 0
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
No 2020-08-15 13:23
No 2020-08-15 19:18
No 2020-08-15 20:35

Evidences

Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Evidence based on Challenge Justification The Challenger Justification is solely based on what can happen, not What ACTUALLY HAPPENED. I will be attaching a PDF File that explains my evidence. My challenger CANNOT prove that the said article views were manipulated, and this word document file will explain why this is not so.

Evidence #2:

Challenge Justification It does not meet any of the conditions necessary to be accepted in High impact. The assumed number of views is wrong. It was already verified that the views number can be tricked refreshing the website. A similar case was already ruled denying the aceptance into the list, please see the case https://curate.kleros.io/tcr/0x99A0f0e0d9Ee776D791D2E55c215d05ccF7286fC/0x3e3249a349b5f88e63dd8318468614af3e01e4c29ea160ab2deb9f4a72a0694b If the submitter think that this post expands significantlly the Kleros Knowledge, he/she would have submited earlier. Even more, the same submitter has an item in the same platform in the standard list, reinforcing the argument that the article do not cumply the requirement of expands significantly the kleros knowledge and it's submission is based in the viewers of the article which, as said before, can be manipulated (see submission https://curate.kleros.io/tcr/0x7884a7ADf697e18357087FE8F994669042Af4ae9/0x60ae54d9088d80f742883db427df8b781f57188e9bc2480f44df0c7a65550e0a)
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve