All the evidence and your arguments presented in this case are around the bug in the UI that prevents you to appeal the previous case (Case 238), but in that case, the jurors after look the evidence that you present (the same evidence that you are showing in this case), the rule was 3 to 0 against add your item to the High Impact List. This to me, it's a closed case.
Why this is not an high impact article?, because there is no evidece that some readers had interact with the article, nobody has share it ,or liked it. Maybe, you can write an improved version of this article, with more engagement and this could qualify as high impact. This article, in the submission time, belongs more to the Standard List than to the High Impact list. I encourage you to submit the item in the standard curated list.Finally, I would like to finish my argumentation saying that it's not very polite of your part to theat the jurors saying that now you can appeal. Some times, it's better to accept the others opinion about what we do.