Reaction to challenger's arguments I can't agree with the argument that all similar submissions were rejected, because this piece of content which was clapped by 13 people, was accepted: https://curate.kleros.io/tcr/0x99A0f0e0d9Ee776D791D2E55c215d05ccF7286fC/0xa4210c8c7a0bb5c062a2e8f5e0702f12e2d50d9e8946207fe9ea0dd2fec89910 And I don't want to point that this acceptance could be unfair, because this piece of content satisfies the condition "Expand significantly the Kleros knowledge base” because it is a rather detailed and useful article about the problem of subjective judgement. My article touches upon the juror process on Kleros, and I have tried to consider this process in detail in order to make it useful for readers. So, I think that my submission satisfies the same condition "Expand significantly the Kleros knowledge base”. And if it satisfies at least one condition from the guidelines for High Impact Submissions, it should be accepted in accordance with that document.

Reaction to submitter's justification. The statistics from the submitter's account do not comply with the rules for High Impact. Average reading time is just 34 seconds, while the whole article takes 5 minutes to read, thus people are just scanning the article. it has been viewed 149 times, the policy demands a minimum of 500. Furthermore just 14 people liked the article, which also shows that submitted article did not have a high impact. As the submitter wrote, his article indeed had a certain impact, but not a high impact. This article should be submitted to standard impact instead. I want to remind the jurors that recent similar submission all got rejected, setting a precedent that this submission should also be rejected.

Justification for my opinion It is noticed in the guidelines for High Impact Submissions that content should be accepted if it satisfies at least one of the conditions, but not all of them. My article satisfies the criterion "Expand significantly the Kleros knowledge base (explaining the juror process, the flow and structure of dapps that integrate Kleros, the court process, etc)” because this piece of content explains the juror process in a rather detailed way that can be really valuable for people who want to get to know the way the platform works and how it can be applied. Also, I attached the file with the statistics from my personal account. It demonstrates the number of views (readers) and claps (likes). I have no 500 views, but my statistics is not so poor as “potentially only 10 people”. And if 14 people liked this article, they considered it as a useful content for them. So, this article had a certain impact, but it should be accepted in according with the condition "Expand significantly the Kleros knowledge base”.

Challenge Justification Submitted article only has 454 claps and 1 response, note that every Medium user can give up to 50 claps. This means that potentially only 10 people read the submitted article, although the listing policy clearly states a minimum of 500. ➤ Has a significant audience on the platform it is posted. Accept: An article has been read by at least 500 times. Evidently, this submission does not comply with the listing criteria and should therefore be rejected. A rejection of this submission would be in accordance with previous (NO) rulings for similar disputes, such as: ➤https://curate.kleros.io/tcr/0x99A0f0e0d9Ee776D791D2E55c215d05ccF7286fC/0xa1d62fb6f4e95430112281dbb0571ed60a93e518dfd9153cf9728a2cb6205fb9 ➤https://curate.kleros.io/tcr/0x99A0f0e0d9Ee776D791D2E55c215d05ccF7286fC/0x4714a3e7f7b0b6ef98f4e992a4dcd1bde6b5fc00fe0655aa50739c990c74ebcb ➤https://curate.kleros.io/tcr/0x99A0f0e0d9Ee776D791D2E55c215d05ccF7286fC/0x3e3249a349b5f88e63dd8318468614af3e01e4c29ea160ab2deb9f4a72a0694b