Justification for my opinion
It is noticed in the guidelines for High Impact Submissions that content should be accepted if it satisfies at least one of the conditions, but not all of them. My article satisfies the criterion "Expand significantly the Kleros knowledge base (explaining the juror process, the flow and structure of dapps that integrate Kleros, the court process, etc)” because this piece of content explains the juror process in a rather detailed way that can be really valuable for people who want to get to know the way the platform works and how it can be applied.
Also, I attached the file with the statistics from my personal account. It demonstrates the number of views (readers) and claps (likes). I have no 500 views, but my statistics is not so poor as “potentially only 10 people”. And if 14 people liked this article, they considered it as a useful content for them. So, this article had a certain impact, but it should be accepted in according with the condition "Expand significantly the Kleros knowledge base”.