Dispute #213

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Curation 2020-06-18 05:31 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2020-07-06 01:05
Arbitrable Creator
Curate

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
2 5 0 0

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
2 1 0 0
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
Yes 2020-06-23 22:21
Yes 2020-06-21 18:47
No 2020-06-23 15:55

Round 1

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
1 6 0 0
Round 1 Vote Casting Date
No 2020-06-29 21:33
No 2020-07-01 12:51
Yes 2020-06-26 22:40
No 2020-07-01 01:07
No 2020-06-30 18:45
No 2020-06-28 16:58
No 2020-06-28 16:58

Evidences

Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Challenge Justification The claim of fake news violates the guidelines for fake news submissions. Specifically: Reject a submission if it is - A subjective statement (i.e. The claim of falsehood is a dispute of opinion.) The President stated in the tweet: "...75 year old Martin Gugino was pushed away after appearing to scan police communications..." 'appearing to' is an opinion/commentary on the events in the video. It's not a statement of a fact. The President did not say "he scanned" their equipment. The submission states: "The man does not appear to scan anything." Which is also an opinion of the sequence of events shown in the video. As such, this submission appears to be a difference of opinion (a subjective statement), not an appropriate claim of "Fake news."
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve