Dispute #202

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Onboarding 2020-06-02 13:45 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2020-06-11 05:55
Arbitrable Creator
Dispute Resolver 0x5dce...025c

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
1 0 0 1

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
2 0 0 1
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
0x48e2a511e5956e5b3f321c43d8ddec68ef9ae94e Pending
0x4c9447296a38f56dcbced69a3baa74bc4ce35816 Yes 2020-06-05 15:23
0x4c9447296a38f56dcbced69a3baa74bc4ce35816 Yes 2020-06-05 15:23

Evidences

Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

A contract is a contract If the contract didnt mentioned that it will disolve if one of the parties dies, the contract is still valid. Meaning that the videographer has to fullfil his side of the agreement (making a video about the weeding) and that the deposit is not refundable. The videographer offered to extend his side of the contract to a later date and therefore is still holding to the agreement. Therefore the remaining party of the couple has also hold to theirs side of the agreement, although it might be a little cynical to do the job on the next wedding of the remaining person. Additionally the non-refundable deposit is meant for expenses the videographer has to pay upfront, which he might also not get back, if the contract is disolved. Therefore he was asking for the non-refundable deposit.
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve