Dispute #196

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Onboarding 2020-05-06 06:14 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2020-05-12 18:41
Arbitrable Creator
Dispute Resolver 0x44de...3eb3

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
1 4 0 0

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
1 6 0 0
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
0x23eebb090c430783bf0665478ea6d5793b44a3c3 No 2020-05-10 12:35
0x982f5698febb2b8d1b9a560228abbceafbb11568 No 2020-05-09 18:32
0x982f5698febb2b8d1b9a560228abbceafbb11568 No 2020-05-09 18:32
0x982f5698febb2b8d1b9a560228abbceafbb11568 No 2020-05-09 18:32
0xb841a0a64399e0c391629ede0ad2ce6336351b33 Yes 2020-05-08 09:31
0xde262c51a45ddd0a40538b7e140efdc3c363cbc6 No 2020-05-10 02:44
0xf936b0f5b5a9af020801a6ee021ff0cf72028d38 No 2020-05-08 02:44

Evidences

Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Opinion The issues with the steering wheel are my reason to hold the shop liable. It is obvious that both parties agreed on a contract over a car that is suitable for save driving. The car shop has superior knowledge and is therefore responsible for providing that safety. The air conditioner on the other hand does not necessarily fall in the range of malfunctions for which the shop should be liable. The stirring wheel, however outweighs this.
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve