Dispute #196

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Onboarding 2020-05-06 06:14 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2020-05-12 18:41
Arbitrable Creator
Dispute Resolver

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
1 4 0 0

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
1 6 0 0
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
No 2020-05-10 12:35
No 2020-05-09 18:32
No 2020-05-09 18:32
No 2020-05-09 18:32
Yes 2020-05-08 09:31
No 2020-05-10 02:44
No 2020-05-08 02:44


Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Opinion The issues with the steering wheel are my reason to hold the shop liable. It is obvious that both parties agreed on a contract over a car that is suitable for save driving. The car shop has superior knowledge and is therefore responsible for providing that safety. The air conditioner on the other hand does not necessarily fall in the range of malfunctions for which the shop should be liable. The stirring wheel, however outweighs this.
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve