Dispute #184

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Non-Technical 2020-04-24 15:47 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2020-05-03 16:02
Arbitrable Creator
Tokens

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
1 0 0 1

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
1 0 0 2
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
Pending
Pending
Yes 2020-04-29 22:39

Evidences

Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Token contract name is irrelevent The criterion document explicitly states about the name that "The name should be the most commonly used name to refer to the asset. It does not necessarily need to be the official name given by project creators nor the one inĀ  the token contract.". The main place where this token is referred to is in the curve app with the name "bCurve".

Evidence #2:

Token contract has different ticker name See attachment or see: https://etherscan.io/token/0x3B3Ac5386837Dc563660FB6a0937DFAa5924333B#readContract

Evidence #3:

Name and ticker correct Name and ticker have been determined in coordination with curve.fi https://beta.curve.fi/contracts

Evidence #4:

Token challenge Incorrect name and ticker
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve