Dispute #182

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Non-Technical 2020-04-24 15:39 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2020-05-03 12:11
Arbitrable Creator
Tokens

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
1 2 0 0

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
1 2 0 0
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
No 2020-04-28 14:55
Yes 2020-04-29 23:57
No 2020-04-27 21:41

Evidences

Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Logo in accordance with listing policy The provided symbol is in harmony with the listing criteria in terms of its data format (PNG transparent background) and file size. The logo quality should "not appear pixelated or blurry unless those are on-purpose features of the symbol." It may be argued that what the challenger describes as "poorly cut" is part of the original symbol and the objections therefore do not justify to reject the token's registration.

Evidence #2:

Token quality remains Policy: "It should be of a definition high enough such that it should not appear pixelated or blurry unless those are on-purpose features of the symbol." Logo is unfortunately not of high definition and it appears pixelated/blurry. The displayed logo is indeed the only one available now, because the original website went offline, but it's certainly not the original logo. This one is (badly) cut from a white background. Therefore this submission should be denied.

Evidence #3:

Logo correct The displayed logo is the original and only emblem of existence for CIBIX7: https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/cbi-index-7

Evidence #4:

Token challenge Logo is poorly cut
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve