Klerosboard 2.0 | Dispute 159

Court	Start Date	Dispute Status	Current Period	Time remaining	End Date
Onboarding	2020-02-08 00:33	Already Ruled	Execution	Already Ruled	2020-02-15 05:09

Arbitrable	Creator
None

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes	No	Refuse to arbitrate	Pending
4	1	1	0

Round 0

Yes	No	Refuse to arbitrate	Pending
21	1	8	0

Round 0	Vote	Casting Date
	Yes	2020-02-12 23:01
	Refuse to Arbitrate	2020-02-10 18:22
	Refuse to Arbitrate	2020-02-10 18:22
	Refuse to Arbitrate	2020-02-10 18:22
	Refuse to Arbitrate	2020-02-10 18:22
	Refuse to Arbitrate	2020-02-10 18:22
	Refuse to Arbitrate	2020-02-10 18:22
	Refuse to Arbitrate	2020-02-10 18:22
	Refuse to Arbitrate	2020-02-10 18:22
	Yes	2020-02-10 10:54
	Yes	2020-02-10 10:54
	Yes	2020-02-10 10:54
	Yes	2020-02-10 10:54
	Yes	2020-02-10 10:54
	Yes	2020-02-10 10:54
	Yes	2020-02-10 10:54
	Yes	2020-02-10 10:54
	Yes	2020-02-10 10:54
	Yes	2020-02-10 10:54
	Yes	2020-02-10 10:54
	Yes	2020-02-10 10:54
	Yes	2020-02-10 10:54
	Yes	2020-02-10 10:54
	Yes	2020-02-10 10:54
	Yes	2020-02-10 10:54
	Yes	2020-02-10 10:54
	Yes	2020-02-10 10:54
	Yes	2020-02-10 22:02
	No	2020-02-09 20:50
	Yes	2020-02-09 18:51

Evidences

Evidence #1:

This is obvious It is obvious that I want a video about my restaurant, not a restaurant in France. Why would I pay to have video promoting another restaurant? Why would I put a video of an other restaurant on my website?

0x67311d3d0B16486c3CB74080e811669B00267202

Evidence #2:

Bob just sent me a random youtube video which was not even about my restaurant. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzWk_e1ptK0

0x67311d3d0B16486c3CB74080e811669B00267202

Evidence #3:

Video I sent complies The contract specifies a "Marketing Video of 120 seconds for Alice's restaurant website". It does not specify it has to be her restaurant in the video. The quality of video is definitely good.