Dispute #152

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Non-Technical 2020-01-15 09:46 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2020-01-22 11:05
Arbitrable Creator
Tokens 0x4a2c...0488

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 2 0 0

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 3 0 0
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
0xc31372db84e456193e72a162928539c8f5999ff6 No 2020-01-18 19:31
0xf035561dce033ded865e15e69db06cffc88d9213 No 2020-01-18 15:39
0xf035561dce033ded865e15e69db06cffc88d9213 No 2020-01-18 15:39


Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Coin suffix should also be avoided. "Suffixes such as, but not limited to: “Token”, “Coin” should generally be avoided, unless a name with suffix is already well established."

Evidence #2:

Zero Carbon Project is the mostly used name. "The name should be the most commonly used name to refer to the asset. It does not necessarily need to be the official name given by project creators nor the one in the token contract." Thus, the name in the Sale legal documents is not the correct name to be used for the TCR.

Evidence #3:

Logo Please see the official LinkedIn page below. Happy to submit more for evidence if that is what is needed. https://www.linkedin.com/company/zerocarbonproject

Evidence #4:

Logo seems wrong Considering the most used logo, it should be the one with a lightning. One can check the different media sites and check attached png.

Evidence #5:

Correct Name Attached are the Terms of Sale legal documents showing the name as "Zero Carbon Coin"

Evidence #6:

Token challenge Incorrect name. Name should be Zero Carbon Project.
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve