Dispute #101

Court Start Date Dispute Status Current Period Time remaining End Date
Non-Technical 2019-07-16 09:17 Already Ruled Execution Already Ruled 2019-07-25 19:24
Arbitrable Creator
Tokens

Unique Votes in all the rounds

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 3 0 0

Round 0

Yes No Refuse to arbitrate Pending
0 3 0 0
Round 0 Vote Casting Date
No 2019-07-18 23:32
No 2019-07-21 08:13
No 2019-07-22 07:17

Evidences

Evidences provided by Vagarish

Evidence #1:

Wrong order The correct order should be to request the removal of the old token, and then proceed to submit the new one. This may be the first real occurence of a token update, but all of the token updates (uploading a higher quality version of token image) in the past always get removed first and resubmitted. There is always a possibility that a token removal might get rejected.

Evidence #2:

Submission age as a tie solution. When comparing the two submissions, if the newer is more accurate than the previous, it should take its place. I suggest jurors to accept this submission and for the submitter to place a removal request on the previous once/if this one is accepted.

Evidence #3:

Duplicate smart contract address While the name is different, it still refer to the same token, proved by the same smart contract address.

Evidence #4:

Dublicate We will continue with last submission with name aurorachain

Evidence #5:

Token Name Name of Token is AURORA, Whereas the last submission is using Name Aurorachain, verify name in coinmarketcap also check this screenshot - http://prntscr.com/ofp4z8

Evidence #6:

Token Already Exist Please request a removal of existing token before submitting a newer version, or it will result in duplicates

Evidence #7:

Official submission ABove listing is submitted by an official, you can verify by sending email to [email protected]

Evidence #8:

Token challenge Duplicate
Check this Case on Kleros Resolve