Page logo

Case #554

Check the case specific data, case's creator, status and voting history

Evidence Period

6 days 6 hours

Voting Period

5 days 1 hour 30 minutes

Appeal Period

3 days 9 hours

Enforcement

Final Decision

Error trying to read metaEvidence of the Dispute. Please refresh the page

Check the details on Kleros Court

arbitrable logo

Arbitrable


court logo

Court:

date

Start Date:

March 19 2021, 05:54

round

Round:

3

jurors

15 Jurors

jury

Jury Decision: 

No** with 13 votes (86.7%)

0255075100Percentage of votes
  • No**
  • Yes**
  • Vote:

    No**

  • Date:

    April 9 2021, 11:23

  • Vote:

    No**

  • Date:

    April 9 2021, 11:23

  • Vote:

    No**

  • Date:

    April 7 2021, 23:10

  • Vote:

    No**

  • Date:

    April 5 2021, 16:25

  • Vote:

    Yes**

  • Date:

    April 5 2021, 18:20

  • Vote:

    No**

  • Date:

    April 9 2021, 12:54

  • Vote:

    No**

  • Date:

    April 9 2021, 12:54

  • Vote:

    No**

  • Date:

    April 8 2021, 14:13

  • Vote:

    No**

  • Date:

    April 8 2021, 14:13

  • Vote:

    No**

  • Date:

    April 5 2021, 20:29

  • Vote:

    No**

  • Date:

    April 9 2021, 00:48

  • Vote:

    No**

  • Date:

    April 5 2021, 16:42

  • Vote:

    No**

  • Date:

    April 5 2021, 16:42

  • Vote:

    No**

  • Date:

    April 5 2021, 16:42

  • Vote:

    Yes**

  • Date:

    April 6 2021, 22:51

Evidence

The subject in the image is not facing the camera

This submission violates point 2 of the guidelines: "The picture should include the face of the submitter facing the camera and [...]" The subject in the picture is not facing the camera.

Submitted by: 0xC2e0...84F5 in March 19 2021, 16:57

The submission follows the rules

Definition of front-facing: "that part or side that is forward, prominent, or most often seen or used" I am front-facing the camera and my facial features are visible in the pic. The rules don’t specify a specific angle or say I must face the camera straight on. I am following the rules

Submitted by: 0x00De...5Fc3 in March 31 2021, 12:47

Biased data by the NO votes

The video recently created by the NO votes was biased (not double blind, creators of video disregarded evidence they didnt agree with)

Submitted by: 0x00De...5Fc3 in April 5 2021, 13:33

photo is front facing, identifies owocki

an unbiased citizen ran this analysis showing that the photo is front facing enough to identify owocki https://twitter.com/clublandgrace/status/1378682311433187333

Submitted by: 0x00De...5Fc3 in April 5 2021, 13:33

Bias was displayed at 48 minutes into the video.

To 0xE86e...3156 : The bias was displayed at 48min, where interviewer excluded an answer from the data (she had answered "all of them", but it was conveniently "not recorded" by the interviewer) Given this bias, we need to have proof the video was not edited to only include "Yes" answers.

Submitted by: 0x00De...5Fc3 in April 5 2021, 18:35

summary of problems with 60 minute video.

1. experiment was not double blind. 2. interviewer does not count answers they do not like (eg at 48 minutes answer not counted). 3. definition of 'front facing' not seeded with interviewees in video. 4. no proof that video was not doctored submitted or interviewees were not coached or pre-seeded.

Submitted by: 0x00De...5Fc3 in April 5 2021, 20:56

definition of front-facing is most important

per https://dictionary.reverso.net/english-definition/front+facing (no1 result on google) the definition of 'front facing' is "that part or side that is forward, prominent, or most often seen or used". in the photo, owocki's front of his face is facing the front. thus the photo should be accepted.

Submitted by: 0x00De...5Fc3 in April 5 2021, 20:59